Opportunities for connection and support around self-managed abortion
by Carrie Purcell, Victoria Newton, Fiona Bloomer, Ayomide Oluseye, and Lesley Hoggart
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Carrie Purcell is a Research Fellow at the Open University in Scotland and leads the Reproduction, Sexualities and Sexual Health Research Group. Her research interests focus around sexual and reproductive health (particularly abortion and contraception), pain, embodiment, and reproductive justice. Carrie’s work is primarily qualitative and interdisciplinary, with groundings in medical sociology.
Victoria Newton is a Senior Research Fellow at the Open University and PI on the AHRC-funded Reproductive Bodylore project. Her research interests include contraception, menstruation and vernacular knowledge.
Fiona Bloomer is a Senior Lecturer in Social Policy at Ulster University. Fiona’s research played a key role in informing the campaign to decriminalise abortion in Northern Ireland. She has published widely on abortion policy and provision and is lead author of the book Reimagining Global Abortion Politics.
Ayomide Oluseye is a Lecturer in Health and Social Care at the Open University. Her research interests span gender, education, and the sexual and reproductive health of marginalised populations. Ayomide has expertise in policy analysis, qualitative methodologies and systematic research in low and middle-income contexts.
Lesley Hoggart is Professor of Social Policy Research at the Open University and a reproductive health researcher with primary interests in abortion and contraception. Lesley was PI on the Abortion During Covid-19 study, and led development of the My Body, My Life interactive travelling exhibition and multi-media installation, designed to destigmatise abortion.
ABOUT THE CRFR BLOG
This is the official blog of the Centre for Research on Families and Relationships.
To keep up to date on all the latest posts and related events from CRFR, please subscribe via the button below.
This Blog is moderated by a CRFR representative who reserves the right to exercise editorial control over posted content.
Please note: the views expressed in a post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of CRFR.
Abortion provision in the United Kingdom has undergone significant changes in recent years. 2018 saw permissions in Britain for home use of the second of two medications used in early medication abortion (EMA). And, in 2019, abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland. The Covid-19 pandemic led to approval of home use of both EMA medications in Britain from mid-2020 onward.
While these permissions now have some longer-term security, abortion in Britain remains legal only in specific circumstances, and is otherwise a criminal offence. Troublingly, the number of women prosecuted under abortion laws has increased substantially in recent years. In Northern Ireland, over four years on from decriminalisation, telemedical abortion is not yet provided by the NHS (National Health Service). Recognised international providers continue to offer this, supported by activist groups like Alliance for Choice. NHS second trimester surgical abortion became available in late 2023.
Early in the pandemic, we began a joint research study between the Open University, Ulster University, and the University of Glasgow, designed to capture experiences of abortion across the UK (United Kingdom), as they morphed from requiring clinic attendance to being primarily home-based. We set out to understand what the support needs might be for those self-managing abortion at home. From late 2020 to early 2021, we carried out telephone interviews with 20 women (self-identified) who had recently undergone abortion. Much of what participants had told us related to support and a sense of connectedness.
We drew out the idea of ‘social connectedness’ – a counterpoint to the idea of ‘social distancing’ which was so ubiquitous throughout the pandemic – to help us understand the most important components of support in this context. As we explain in a recent paper published in the journal Culture, Health and Sexuality, this allowed us to identify key aspects of those experiences. These related to feeling cared for, feeling connectedness at home, and what presented disruptions or challenges to connectedness. Looking in-depth at these themes allowed us to understand some of the implications of the shift to very minimal contact with health professionals around abortion and to highlight gaps in support needs. While the majority of participants in this study were in favour of continuing home self-management as an option, they highlighted numerous elements which could have improved their experiences.
Participants valued feeling cared for, which included a sense of connection with, and trust in, health professionals they encountered, typically established in an initial consultation. The also valued connectedness at home, with in-person support networks of family and friends present during the abortion process – difficult or limited for some, given the restrictions on social interaction in force at the time – and with home as a place of safety and comfort. While participants were glad to have home self-management available, it was easy for fear and anxieties to creep in. ‘Home comforts’ helped to minimise negative experiences.
The wider isolation of the pandemic context magnified isolation which can occur around abortion, even in more ‘normal’ circumstances, and was exacerbated by an absence of familiarity with what abortion entails. Where participants felt connected with health professionals, they appeared to feel supported, whether or not they actually sought follow-up care. The sense of safety and comfort this helped create was balanced against the fact that many felt under-prepared for the physical experience of EMA, including the associated abdominal pain, bleeding, vomiting and diarrhoea and, for some, the time it took to finally pass all of the pregnancy tissue.
Together, these various elements of connectedness spoke to persistent and burdensome challenges faced by those seeking abortion, a component of sexual and reproductive healthcare which has been legally provided in Britain for almost 60 years. These difficulties are perpetuated by stigma, negativity, silence and exceptionalisation – that is, the marking out of abortion as somehow fundamentally different to any other aspect of reproductive healthcare. Access has, in many ways, improved drastically since 1967, and has begun to recover from the restrictions imposed in the Covid-19 pandemic. Development of NHS services in Northern Ireland is still a work in progress, while abortion rates are rising across the UK. Getting abortion provision right therefore has immediate relevance to the widest number of people that it has for some time. Fostering clarity around what contemporary abortion care comprises, and appropriate support for that care, will play an essential part in moving forward, rather than backsliding into a culture of fear and hostility around reproductive rights.
Lesley Hoggart, Carrie Purcell, Fiona Bloomer, Victoria Newton & Ayomide Oluseye (13 Oct 2023): Social connectedness and supported self-management of early medication abortion in the UK: experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic and learning for the future, Culture, Health & Sexuality, DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2258189